Louis Barbier, Sodali Country Manager for France, highlights for Decideurs the concerns raised in the context of Vivendi and Renault AGM: the maintain of one-share one-vote principle was, in fact, rejected at Vivendi AGM while Renault board of Directors is still fighting with the French State to get the same resolution approved at upcoming Renault AGM on April 30th.
Louis Barbier well explains the two reasons behind the rejection of double voting rights from institutional investors. The first one, a matter of equity: power must be proportional to the share capital, the reverse may create abuse. The second one is a technical reason: to get the double voting right you need registered shares, hardly compatible with a professional investment approach.
Related News
How Boards Can Make the Most of Activist-Appointed Directors
09 September 2026
New Diligent Market Intelligence report finds fewer proxy fights, more negotiated boardroom gains and longer settlement timelines in the first half of 2026
30 July 2026
Proxy Advisory Firms Are Here to Stay, but Their Role Is Changing
28 July 2026
Measurabl Expands Partner Network with Six Leading Service Providers as New Members
16 July 2026
Media enquiries
To contact our global experts for comments please get in touch below.
Contact us chevron_right