The emergence of ESG issues has generated a wholesale reevaluation of corporations’ so-called social compact. Accordingly, corporate executives and boards of directors are expected to attend to an expanding list of ESG topics. While governance can be evaluated across different companies using a standardized checklist of best practices, a prescriptive, one-size-fits-all approach does not work for environmental and social issues. Global E and S standardization continues to be an important goal, however, a bespoke analysis of individual companies on E and S issues will continue to be necessary.
These are the main issues raised in the paper written by John Wilcox, Chairman Emeritus of Morrow Sodali, and published in Sustainable Brands. “It is important to carefully consider whether the financial materiality standard is sufficiently comprehensive to embrace ESG issues,” remarks John. The rise of company-specific materiality assessments will over the long term require companies to undertake substantial organizational and behavioral adjustments. This transition will also impact institutional investors who will need to reduce their reliance on standardized metrics, regulatory guidelines and wholesale recommendations from outside advisors and service providers and dig more deeply into the inner workings of individual portfolio companies and systematically engage with their management.
Read the full article here.
Related News
How Boards Can Make the Most of Activist-Appointed Directors
09 September 2026
New Diligent Market Intelligence report finds fewer proxy fights, more negotiated boardroom gains and longer settlement timelines in the first half of 2026
30 July 2026
Proxy Advisory Firms Are Here to Stay, but Their Role Is Changing
28 July 2026
Measurabl Expands Partner Network with Six Leading Service Providers as New Members
16 July 2026
Media enquiries
To contact our global experts for comments please get in touch below.
Contact us chevron_right