In a world of active, empowered shareholders, the match between shareholders and public corporations potentially affects firm value. This Article examines the extent to which publicly held corporations can shape their shareholder base. Two sorts of approaches are available: “direct” or “recruitment” strategies and “shaping” or “socialization” strategies. Direct or recruitment strategies, which attract “good” shareholders to the firm, include going public, targeted placement of shares, traditional investor relations, the exploitation of clientele effects, and “de-recruitment.” Shaping or socialization strategies, which transform shareholders of a “bad” or unknown type into shareholders of the “good” type, include choice of domicile, choice of stock exchange, the new “strategic” investor relations, and capital structure. For each type of strategy, I consider the extent to which corporate and securities law facilitates or interferes with the strategy as well as the ways in which it controls abuse. In examining the relationship between shareholder base and firms, this Article attempts to merge investor relations, very broadly construed, with corporate governance.
Related News
How Boards Can Make the Most of Activist-Appointed Directors
09 September 2026
New Diligent Market Intelligence report finds fewer proxy fights, more negotiated boardroom gains and longer settlement timelines in the first half of 2026
30 July 2026
Proxy Advisory Firms Are Here to Stay, but Their Role Is Changing
28 July 2026
Measurabl Expands Partner Network with Six Leading Service Providers as New Members
16 July 2026
Media enquiries
To contact our global experts for comments please get in touch below.
Contact us chevron_right